The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has addressed reports about the arrest of controversial critic, VeryDarkMan.
Notably, VeryDarkMan’s arrest has sparked widespread outrage online, [/b]with demands for his release and reports about the details of his arrest emerging. Social media users have been actively voicing their concerns, with some calling for an impartial investigation into the reasons behind the activist's detention.
According to a recent report, VeryDarkMan’s arrest stems from several complaints of cyberstalking, including allegations that he had been using social media platforms to target individuals with harmful content. The details of these accusations remain largely undisclosed, though there has been significant online debate about the legitimacy of the charges. Critics argue that this arrest could be politically motivated, with some suggesting that it was an attempt to silence his outspoken views on corruption and misconduct.
Meanwhile, another report claims the EFCC has broken its silence about VeryDarkMan’s arrest, addressing the matter publicly for the first time in response to growing online scrutiny. The commission has reportedly clarified its stance on the issue, asserting that its actions are in line with the law, despite the widespread criticism surrounding the incident.
Amid swirling reports, EFCC breaks silence on X (formerly Twitter), debunking the reports with a post marked with a red X crossmark. This official post sought to clear any misconceptions and present the commission's side of the story, aiming to provide some transparency in the midst of mounting public pressure. The EFCC's statement did little to quell the rising outrage, however, as users continued to voice their discontent on social media platforms.
Meanwhile, this development has reignited online discussions, fueling speculation about VeryDarkMan’s detention. Social media platforms have been flooded with a mix of support and condemnation, with some alleging that the activist’s arrest is part of a broader strategy to stifle dissent. Protests and public statements calling for his release have continued to emerge, with many demanding that the EFCC provide more concrete details regarding the charges ag
ainst him.